Regulations in the US and EU Dealing with Combination Products

Regulations in the US and EU Dealing with Combination Products.jpg

Registering and maintaining combination products in the US and the EU is a bit tricky, because these are disparate markets that are governed by different sets of regulations which are independent of each other. So, any business that wants to market combination products into the US or the EU must be completely aware of the nature and meaning of all the regulations. Such businesses need to understand the nuances of the regulatory expectations and do what it takes to meet these.

Professionals and organizations that work in these areas must familiarize themselves with the existing regulations and their latest updates. This is the foundation to ensuring that their products comply with regulatory requirements and meet quality standards, which ensures that the consumer consumes products that are of the set scientific standards.

The regulations in the two markets have evolved differently. The fact that the regulatory agencies in the two markets, namely the US FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) work to ensure the quality of drugs and thus the wellbeing of their consumers is the commonality between the two.

While the US FDA is a centralized agency that regulates food and medicinal products across the vast US market; the EMA, synchronizes the regulations of the 28 countries that are members of the European Union. While the FDA was primarily created to be a consumer protection agency; the regulations from the EMA came about to harmonize the commercial and technological interests of the Member States.

The EU’s new update

Regulations in the US and EU Dealing with Combination Products 3.jpg

In September 2016, the EU, through its two major legislative organs -the European Commission and the European Council, reached a compromise on a major area concerning combination products. Reached four years after a deal was made; the compromise relates to medical devices and invitro diagnostic (IVD) devices.

High risk combination devices, such as implants, will from now be assessed and authorized by the EMA. Brought in to replace the existing EU legislation on medical devices and in-vitro diagnostics; the new regulation seeks to make these products more consistent and uniform in terms of their assessment and approval process across the EU.

Thorough and sound learning of the US and EU regulations on combination products

This is the case of just one regulation in the EU concerning combination products. When the regulations and their updates from both the US and the EU are taken together, a regulatory professional or anyone in manufacturing is up against a mountain. It is to help gain clarity on this wide array of topics that GlobalCompliancePanel, a leading provider of professional trainings for the areas of regulatory compliance, will be organizing a two-day seminar.

This seminar, which is aimed at giving professionals who work in areas concerning regulation in the combination products area, will have Salma Michor, founder and CEO of Michor Consulting Schweiz GmbH, as the Director.

Please visit Regulations in the US and EU Dealing with Combination Products to register for this seminar. This seminar has been pre-approved by RAPS as eligible for up to 12 credits towards a participant’s RAC recertification upon full completion.

Clarity about combination products

Regulations in the US and EU Dealing with Combination Products 1.jpg

Over two days of intense learning, Salma will offer a thorough understanding of the complexities involved in the regulations about combination products in the EU and the US. She will offer in-depth explanation of all the relevant regulations and guidelines. She will reinforce this learning by offering real life examples of how to register and maintain various types of combination products.

Salma will also help participants explore Interfaces, at which Change Management and LCM will be taken up for explanation. Other important aspects relating to the subject of combination products, namely compliant safety reporting for combination products and documentation requirements and interfacing, will be described in detail at this session.

Over the two days of intense learning, Salma will cover the following areas:

Documentation requirements and interfacing

Regulations in the US and EU Dealing with Combination Products 4

  • Documentation requirements for combination products EU
  • Documentation requirements for combination products US
  • Interfacing, development, quality, regulatory
  • Managing third parties and document control.

This seminar is of high value to professionals whose work is related in one or another way to combination products, such as Regulatory Affairs, Medical Officers, and Clinical Trial Managers.

click to continue reading

 

 

GMP and Regulatory Expectations for Early IND Products

 GMP and Regulatory Expectations for Early IND ProductsWhat the FDA’s recent guidance documents covering GMP requirements for Phase I products have done is to significantly reduce a few of the complexities that early phase products are typically against. These guidance documents are in addition to those that cover the CMC sections for IND submissions at Phase I.

These new guidelines appear to remove the need to follow GMPs for Phase I products; yet, this need persists in the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. So, what can be said is that the need for GMP requirements for Phase I products has only been altered, not done away with. The nature of the investigational drug and the extent of the study that is planned will now determine the nature and extent of GMP-related activities.

A training session that will give complete understanding of these aspects

Steven S. Kuwahara, Founder and Principal, GXP BioTechnology LLC, will offer complete clarity on all these points of GMP and regulatory expectations for early IND products at a two-day seminar that is being organized by GlobalCompliancePanel, a leading provider of professional trainings for the areas of regulatory compliance. Please visit GMP and Regulatory Expectations for Early IND Products to enroll for this seminar.

This seminar has been pre-approved by RAPS as eligible for up to 12 credits towards a participant’s RAC recertification upon full completion.

Advice on the GMP guidance document

GMP and Regulatory Expectations for Early IND Products3

At this seminar, Dr. Kuwahara will review the GMP guidance document and discuss how it may be integrated with the recommendations of the guidance documents on CMC requirements. It will be a one-source course at which the regulations and guidelines that apply to early phase products will be presented. In a few cases, these may not be regulations, but needs that, if met, will increase the efficiency of activities as a product proceeds through the development process. Dr. Kuwahara will present these items in the order of product development starting from the point of R & D activities and culminating in the completion of Phase 2 clinical trials.

GMP and Regulatory Expectations for Early IND Products1

Any pharmaceutical personnel who must deal with products both in early and later phases of development, will find this presentation highly valuable, as it will make them aware of the regulatory requirements that will affect operations dealing with these products. The modifications to the GMPs for early phase products have altered the GMPs in such a way as to reduce requirements to allow more efficient work. At the same time, some of the things that may appear to have changed, have not, and personnel in the pharmaceutical sector should be aware of this. This is the learning that Steven will emphasize at this seminar. Directors, Managers and Supervisors in Regulatory Affairs, Quality Assurance and Quality Control will get a grasp of these aspects.

Over these two days, Dr. Kuwahara will cover the following areas:

  • Very Early Stages
  • GLP requirements
  • Early Pre-IND Studies
  • Meetings and Preparing for the IND
  • GMPs for Phase 1 IND products
  • Requirements for Phase 2 INDs
  • Preparing for IND Meetings.

 

To continue GMP updates

Regulatory Filing Requirements and Compliance Processes for medical devices in Japan

Regulatory Filing Requirements and Compliance Processes for medical devices in Japan.jpg

The market for medical devices in Japan is pretty huge. It ranks third in the world after the US and the EU. At just over $ 35 billion a year, which is characterized by an annual growth rate of 3-4 percent; it is far bigger than the markets in the neighborhood, such as China, Malaysia, Singapore and even Australia. Its market for medical devices is comparable to those of Europe and North America. Some of the reasons for this huge market are:

  • The aging population
  • The huge spending power of one of the world’s largest economies
  • The infusion of new technologies into the field of medical devices, which pushes up costs initially
  • The high proportion -nearly a quarter of the entire market -of imported medical devices, especially from the US, which introduce sophisticated, technology-driven products of higher price into the market

Japan’s classification system of medical devices, which classifies these products into Class I, Class II, Class III and Class IV; varies from that of the US or the EU. Adherence to Japanese Industrial Standards, which define industry-wide safety and performance requirements, is mandatory for medical devices.

In addition, the Japanese medical devices market has been undergoing a few major changes. Medical device manufacturers have to deal with strict new package insert requirements. The Marketing Authorization Holder (MAH) system, which deals with licensing rules, have changed, requiring a new MAH License category for In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) devices. New changes have been made into several other aspects of medical devices. These include:

Medical device manufacturers have to also reckon with expanded scope of third party certifications, and comply with rules for Software as a Medical Device and for transferring pre-market certifications.

Full explanation of the regulatory requirements 

Regulatory Filing Requirements and Compliance Processes for medical devices in Japan1

All these factors make it very important for medical devices that want to enter the Japanese market, to get a thorough understanding of the regulatory requirements. Complete understanding of all these and more will be imparted at a two-day seminar from GlobalCompliancePanel, a leading provider of professional trainings for all the areas of regulatory compliance.

David R. Dills, Regulatory & Compliance Consultant with more than 24 years of hands-on experience and a proven track record within the FDA regulated industry; will be the Director of this seminar. David carries an extensive regulatory and compliance background with Class I/II/III and IVD devices, pharmaceutical operations, and manages activities within the global regulatory and compliance arenas.

 

Please log on to Regulatory Filing Requirements and Compliance Processes for medical devices in Japan to enroll for this highly valuable training session which will put the whole gamut of regulatory requirements for medical devices in Japan in perspective. This seminar has been pre-approved by RAPS as eligible for up to 12 credits towards a participant’s RAC recertification upon full completion.

 

Understanding how to streamline the regulatory process

Regulatory Filing Requirements and Compliance Processes for medical devices in Japan3

By attending this seminar, participants will be able to get a proper grasp of the entire registration and approval process in Japan. They will be able to identify and understand the major changes to medical device registration process in Japan. This will help them to streamline the medical device registration process, which will help them to obtain approval for their product in the most cost-effective and timely manner.

 

At this highly interactive session, the Director will let participants discuss their own device registration and approval process relative to their work-related responsibilities and handling submissions. This will be a very hands-on approach to helping them to review and discuss pain points, challenges and solutions.

David will cover the following areas at this seminar:

  • Which regulatory bodies in the Japanese government are responsible for medical device registration in Japan?
  • In Japan, are medical devices required to be registered before they can be sold?
  • What are the different regulatory classifications for medical devices?
  • What are the different application categories for medical device registration?
  • What does the registration pathway look like for each regulatory classification?
  • What are the document requirements for notification for the various classes of medical devices?
  • What are other requirements that are necessary for approval in addition to the device application?
  • Is local testing (type testing/sample testing) required for registration?
  • When are clinical studies required for registration?
  • Is approval in the Country of Origin required for registration?

 

To join us for more information, get in touch

 

 

 

Drugstore stocks tumble as Amazon considers selling prescription drugs online

Drugstore stocks tumble as Amazon considers selling prescription drugs online

Shares of drugmakers dropped in midday trading Friday after CNBC reported Amazon is in the final stages of considering an entrance into selling drug prescriptions.

Walgreens, Rite Aid and CVS Health stocks each slipped 4 percent or more as investors worried Amazon may disrupt the traditional distributors’ hold on the drug prescription market.

Amazon will decide before Thanksgiving whether to move into selling prescription drugs online, according to a source and an email from Amazon viewed by CNBC.

Amazon typically spends years researching opportunities before it telegraphs its intentions. The opportunity to sell drugs online is alluring given its market size – analysts have estimated the U.S. prescription

 

Read More: http://snip.ly/j7tf0#https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/06/drugstore-stocks-tumble-as-amazon-considers-selling-prescription-drugs-online.html

Four years of the EU’s Cosmetics Product Regulation

It has been four years since the EU’s Cosmetics Product Regulation (Regulation EC No. 1223/2009), initiated in December 2009, became operational in July 2013. This regulation was considered path breaking when it was introduced because of its comprehensive nature as well as the extent of the shift it signaled from the legislation from which it took off. It was also considered extremely significant because it suggested a regulatory framework that was in alignment with the most modern technologies and methods available during the present times.

Some of the regulatory modules which are structured into the EU’s Cosmetics Product Regulation include important elements aimed at ensuring safety of cosmetic products and accountability from manufacturers, and include points such as:

o  Cosmetic Product Safety Report (CPSR)

o  Product Information File (PIF)

o  Responsible Person (RP)

o  Label information

o  Cosmetovigilance

o  Substance regulations

o  Claims, etc.

Compliance with the safety regulations set out in EU’s Cosmetics Product Regulation is mandatory. This, though, is not easy, considering the severe clauses that the regulation has for ensuring compliance. These are the reasons for which compliance with the EU’s Cosmetics Product Regulation is challenging:

–       In-market control is assigned to EU Member State competent authorities

–       The flow of information between countries is interlinked by the Cosmetic Product Notification Portal (CPNP), which is fed with the information by the demand for pre-market notification of cosmetic products and by ongoing cosmetovigilance procedures put in place with the respective provisions in the CPR

–       The central role in cosmetovigilance applies to the Responsible Person while the access to manufacturers and responsible persons is assured by product labeling provisions

–       EU and non-EU manufactures of cosmetics as well, as the suppliers of cosmetic ingredients, are required to provide data on their chemicals

–       Compliance with the modules requires know-how, diligence and ongoing adjustment to state of the art of knowledge and documentation.

More challenges

In addition, the EU’s Cosmetics Product Regulation presents more challenges for manufacturers of cosmetic products that want to market to any of the countries of the EU:

The EU’s Cosmetics Product Regulation is so expansive that it represents not only the entry requirements for marketing of cosmetics product in the European Union; but is a model framework for many national legislations worldwide. These legislators are given the choice of either adopting a few parts of the EU’s Cosmetics Product Regulation’s modules, or the structure of the Regulation of its predecessor legislation, the Cosmetics Directive, in full. Therefore, companies need to have the knowledge and the skills needed for complying both with the EU’s Cosmetics Product Regulation and other regulatory frameworks.

There is yet another challenge to implementing the EU’s Cosmetics Product Regulation: The safety assessment. Complying with this part of the EU’s Cosmetics Product Regulation requires extensive knowledge and skill of a host of subjects and issues such as toxicology, chemistry, cosmetology and microbiology, apart from that of regulatory affairs and compliance management. This already tough provision has been made even tougher with the final implementation of the ban on animal testing that the EU introduced in March 2013,

As a result of this ban, considerable confusion abounds about the interpretation of the compliance regulations in the various agencies and sectors that the compliance process has to pass through. If alternative tests are carried out, they are not available for all toxicological endpoints that need assessment as part of the EU’s Cosmetics Product Regulation.

Clearing the confusions

This makes compliance with the EU’s Cosmetics Product Regulation as difficult and complicated as one can imagine. A two-day seminar from GlobalCompliancePanel, a leading provider of professional trainings for all the areas of regulatory compliance, will offer clarity on the provisions of the EU’s Cosmetics Product Regulation. The complicated parts of the regulation, namely the regulatory modules, will be given a clearer understanding.

The Director of this two-day seminar is Dr. Annelie Struessmann, who is the Technical & Regulatory Director with CONUSBAT Regulatory Services, a provider of internationalization compliance services for Cosmetics, Personal Care, Fine Chemicals and Borderline Industries.

To gain better understanding of this regulation, please visit Four years of the EU’s Cosmetics Product Regulation to enroll. This seminar has been pre-approved by RAPS as eligible for up to 12 credits towards a participant’s RAC recertification upon full completion.

At this session, Dr. Struessmann will explain the provisions of the regulatory modules and supplement this with a description of the latest developments and research results. She will use these to show pathways towards compliance, at which she will use practical examples and experiences gained in the course of performing the necessary compliance steps before and while marketing of cosmetics products in the EU.

Seminar Calendar of Upcoming Courses – June to July – 2017

Upcoming-Courses-for-French-Circles-Club

GlobalCompliancePanel’s seminars are a wonderful opportunity for professionals in the regulatory compliance areas to understand the latest happenings and updates in the regulatory compliance areas and to implement them, something they need to climb in their professions. GlobalCompliancePanel brings together a few of the best recognized names in the field of regulatory compliance on its panel of experts. The result: Learning that is effective, valuable and helpful.

GlobalCompliancePanel’s experts help you unravel all the knowledge you need in all the areas of regulatory compliance. At these seminars which are held all over the globe, you get to interact with them in person, so that any doubt or clarification you have is sorted out by none other than the honcho. They help professionals like you implement the regulations and stay updated, so that regulatory compliance causes no stress for you.

GlobalCompliancePanel’s experts offer their insightful analysis into the issues that are of consequence to regulatory professionals in their daily work. Their thoughts help you implement the best practices of the industry into your work. They also offer updates on the latest regulatory requirements arising out of a host of the laws and issues related to regulatory compliance, including, but not limited to medical devices, food and beverages, pharmaceuticals, life sciences, biotechnology and pharmaceutical water systems.

Take a look at our upcoming webinars from GlobalCompliancePanel, which will put you on the road to learning about any area that is of importance to your profession. You can plan your learning from GlobalCompliancePanel by looking at our seminars in the next few weeks at locations of convenience to you. You can choose from a whole range of topics. See which among these trainings suit you: Design of Experiments (DOE) for Process Development and Validation, Writing and implementing effective SOP’s, new FSMA rules, risk management and device regulations, data integrity, combination products, and what have you!

Contact us today!
NetZealous LLC DBA GlobalCompliancePanel
john.robinson@globalcompliancepanel.com
Toll free: +1-800-447-9407
FAX : 302 288 6884
Website: http://bit.ly/Courses-June-to-July-2017

Applied Statistics for FDA Process Validation

The pharmaceutical industry considers Applied Statistics for FDA Process Validation to be of very high importance. In 2011, the FDA set out this guidance for the industry. as part of this guidance, called “Process Validation: General Principles and Practices”, which sets the framework for Process Validation in the pharmaceutical industry, any organization in the pharmaceutical industry has to set up a three-stage process.

These are the three stages:

I.           Process Design

II.           Process Qualification, and

III.           Continued Process Verification.

Stage 1, or what is called the Process Design stage, is the stage in which the commercial manufacturing process is defined. This definition is based on knowledge gained through development and scale-up activities.

Stage 2, called the Process Qualification, is the stage in which an evaluation is made of the process design to determine if the process is capable of reproducible commercial manufacturing.

Stage 3, the Continued Process Verification, is meant for giving ongoing assurance during routine production to ensure that the process remains in a state of control.

A seminar on the ways implementing Applied Statistics for FDA Process Validation

GlobalCompliancePanel, a leading provider of professional trainings for the regulatory compliance areas, will be organizing a two-day seminar in which the ways of using Applied Statistics for FDA Process Validation will be taught. Richard Burdick, Emeritus Professor of Statistics, Arizona State University (ASU) and former Quality Engineering Director for Amgen, Inc., will be the Director of this seminar on applied statistics for FDA Process Validation.

In order to learn Applied Statistics for FDA Process Validation in-depth, please register by visiting Applied Statistics for FDA Process Validation. This course has been pre-approved by RAPS as eligible for up to 12 credits towards a participant’s RAC recertification upon full completion.

A detailed and methodical approach to implementing statistical methodologies

This two-day course on Applied Statistics for FDA Process Validation will focus on the ways by which a systematic approach to implementing statistical methodologies into a process validation program consistent with the FDA guidance can be established.

Beginning with a primer on statistics, Dr. Burdick will explain how the methods of Applied Statistics for FDA Process Validation seminar can be applied in each remaining chapter.

Dr. Burdick will next move on to explaining the two fundamental requirements for Process Validation, namely the application of statistics for setting specifications and assessing measurement systems (assays).

He well then show how to apply statistics through the three stages of process validation as defined by requirements in the process validation regulatory guidance documents.

Given that the methods taught through all these three stages are recommended by regulatory guidance documents; this seminar on Applied Statistics for FDA Process Validation will provide references to the specific citations in the guidance documents.

This seminar on Applied Statistics for FDA Process Validation will lead participants into ways of establishing a systematic approach to implementing statistical methodologies into a process development and validation program that is consistent with the FDA guidance.

All-round learning related to Applied Statistics for FDA Process Validation

Dr. Burdick will teach participants how to:

o  Apply statistics for setting specifications

o  Assess measurement systems (assays)

o  Use Design of Experiments (DOE)

o  Develop a control plan as part of a risk management strategy, and

o  Ensure process control/capability.

All concepts at this Applied Statistics for FDA Process Validation seminar are taught within the three-stage product cycle framework defined by requirements in the process validation regulatory guidance documents.

Although established for the pharmaceutical industry, this seminar on Applied Statistics for FDA Process Validation also provides a useful framework for other related industries.

In this important learning on Applied Statistics for FDA Process Validation; Dr. Burdick will cover the following areas:

o  Apply statistics to set specifications and validate measurement systems (assays)

o  Develop appropriate sample plans based on confidence and power

o  Implement suitable statistical methods into a process validation program for each of the three stages

o  Stage 1, Process Design: utilize risk management tools to identify and prioritize potential critical process parameters; and define critical process parameters and operating spaces for the commercial manufacturing process using design of experiments (DOE)

o  Stage 2, Process Qualification: assess scale effects while incorporating large (pilot and/or commercial) scale data; develop process performance qualification (PPQ) acceptance criteria by characterizing intra and inter-batch variability using process design data and batch homogeneity studies; and develop an appropriate sampling plan for PPQ

o  Stage 3, Continued Process Verification: develop a control plan as part of a risk management strategy; collect and analyze product and process data; and ensure your process is in (statistical) control and capable.