FDA Trends for Computer System Validation (CSV) Compliance and Enforcement

The main reason for which many companies were reluctant to adapt the technology.

The FDA has set out requirements for validating all computer systems that handle data regulated by it. These should be in accordance with its guidance on computerized systems, first issued in 1983. The main points of this guidance continue to be consistent today, even with all the changes that technological developments have brought in.

The 1990’s was a decade in which this guidance was revisited for its relevance to the medical device industry. This was because the first issuance was limited to pharmaceuticals.  In 1997, in the context of the move of many FDA-regulated organizations to move into a paperless environment, the FDA issued 21 CFR Part 11, which sought to address electronic records and signatures.

A few changes, such as discretionary enforcement measures, have been brought into this guidance from then, to fashion it to the needs of the industry. Yet, this issuance is rather confusing, although it was intended to help the industry avoid creating a huge regulatory compliance cost, which was the main reason for which many companies were reluctant to adapt the technology.

blog-header-medical-technology-use

What are the current trends in compliance and FDA enforcement?  Technology is a major basis for these trends, although there are other that are based on economics, social media, new diseases, politics, and many other influences.

All these will be discussed in detail at a six-hour learning session from GlobalCompliancePanel, a leading provider of professional training for all the areas of regulatory compliance.  Carolyn Troiano, a senior compliance professional who has worked in the tobacco, pharmaceutical, medical device and other FDA-regulated industries, will be the expert at this webinar, which is being organized on October 28.

Please visit https://www.globalcompliancepanel.com/virtual-seminar/6-hour-virtual-seminar-on-fda-trends-for-computer-system-validation-(csv)-compliance-and-enforcement-10310LIVE to enroll for this valuable learning.

—————————————————————————————————————-

Everything that is required to protect the validity of data that is regulated by the FDA and is stored in electronic format in computer systems will be explained at this webinar. The expert will describe the ways by which to properly validate an FDA-regulated computer system so that security is ensured and data integrity objectives are met.

It is accepted that implementation and adaptation of the System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) methodology is the ideal approach for Computer System Validation (CSV) and for maintaining the system in a validated state throughout its life. Carolyn will explain this aspect in detail at this webinar.

She will also discuss the key areas that are most important during inspection and audit, including security, data integrity, validation, training, and documentation.

The following areas will be explained at this webinar:

Session 1 (90 Mins):

  • FDA Regulatory Oversight
  • Computer System Validation (CSV)
  • System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Methodology

Session 2 (90 Mins):

  • GAMP 5 Software Categorization
  • System Risk Assessment

Session 3 (90 Mins):

  • Requirements
  • Design
  • Testing
  • Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM)
  • Additional Validation Documentation

Session 4 (90 Mins):

  • FDA Inspection Trends
  • Regulatory Influences
  • Response to Change

—————————————————————————————————————-

About the speaker: During the over 35 years she has served in the tobacco, pharmaceutical, medical device and other FDA-regulated industries, Carolyn Troiano has worked directly, or on a consulting basis, for many of the larger pharmaceutical and tobacco companies in the US and Europe, developing and executing compliance strategies and programs.

She developed validation programs and strategies back in the mid-1980s, when the first FDA guidebook was published on the subject, and also collaborated with FDA and other industry representatives on 21 CFR Part 11, the FDA’s electronic record/electronic signature regulation.

Good Laboratory Practices (GLPs) Comparing and Contrasting GMP

Non-clinical laboratory studies in which tests article are studied in test system under laboratory conditions to determine their safety.

To compare and contrast between Good Laboratory Practices and Good Manufacturing practices.

Good Laboratory Practices (GLPs), 21 CFR part 58 are not set of guidelines but they are regulations for conducting nonclinical laboratory studies that support or are intended to support applications for research or marketing permits for products such as food and color additives, human and animal drugs, medical devices for human use, biological products and electronic products that are regulated by the FDA.

microsoft-IoT-AI-insider-lab

GLPs are enforceable by law. They do not include manufacturing of product. GLPS are for non-clinical laboratory studies in which tests article are studied in test system under laboratory conditions to determine their safety. This does not include studies utilizing human subjects, or clinical studies, or field trials on animals.

  • What are Good Laboratory Practices
  • Why were they created
  • What is the objective of GLPs and how are they associated with GMPs and SOPs
  • Statistical procedures for data evaluation
  • Instrumentation validation
  • Analytical and laboratory certification
  • Documentation and maintenance of records
  • Consequences of noncompliance
  • Disqualification and reinstatement

Who will be benefited by this

  • Quality Assurance Personnel
  • Quality Control Personnel
  • Research and Development Personnel
  • Regulatory Affairs Personnel
  • Project Managers
  • Manufacturing Managers
  • Validation Engineers
  • Internal Auditing Personnel
  • Microbiology Personnel
  • Auditors

Instructor Joy McElroy With over 20 years total experience in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, Joy has gained extensive knowledge of Quality Assurance, Process and Cleaning Validation, and Equipment Qualification. She has written and executed Equipment Qualification and Validation Protocols for numerous Companies such as Mallinckrodt, Wyeth Lederle, Merck, BioMerieux, Catalent, and Phillips Medisize. 

Her knowledge, experience, and strong work ethic have made her a highly sought-after engineer in both the pharmaceutical and biotech industries. Joy specializes in Equipment Qualification, Sterilization, Cleaning Validation, and GMP Compliance Auditing.

200+ followers. WOWWWWWW…

followed- 200

Hello Everyone,

Today we have the pleasure of celebrating the fact that we have reached the milestone of 200+ followers on WordPress. Since we started this blog, we have had such a great time connecting with everyone.  we never expected to actually to connect with other people in the blogging community.

we are so incredibly thankful for each and every one of you who follows and comments on my blog posts. Please know that!

we would continue our blogging in these areas FDA Regulation, Medical Devices, Drugs and Biologics, Healthcare Compliance, Biotechnology, Clinical Research, Laboratory Compliance, Quality Management ,HIPAA Compliance ,OSHA Compliance, Risk Management, Trade and Logistics Compliance ,Banking and Financial Services, Auditing/Accounting & Tax, Packaging and Labeling, SOX Compliance, Environmental Compliance, Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet, Geology and Mining, Human Resources Compliance, Food Safety Compliance and etc.

Get more articlehttps://www.globalcompliancepanel.com/freeresources/resource-directory

Please follow us on

Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/TrainingsAtGlobalCompliancePanel

Twitter – https://twitter.com/gcpanel

LinkedIn – https://www.linkedin.com/company/10519587/admin/updates/

Biotech and Pharmaceutical Courses are a gateway to a challenging and flourishing career

Biotech and Pharmaceutical Courses are a gateway to a challenging and flourishing careerWith over four million employed directly or in allied sectors and catering to the world’s largest market and research area, biotech and pharma is a fast growing industry. Its courses are designed to prepare individuals for this giant industry.

Biotech and pharmaceutical courses are much sought after by aspiring professionals in the field of biotech and pharma. This is why:

  • The US is the world’s largest market for pharmaceuticals, as well as being the world leader in biopharmaceutical research
  • Research by Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association (PhRMA) has revealed that the majority of the world’s research and development (R & D) in pharmaceuticals is conducted by U.S. firms
  • These firms hold the intellectual property (IP) rights on most new medicines.

Huge in every sense

Biotech and Pharmaceutical Courses2

Around 5,000 new medicines with approximately 3,400 compounds are currently being studied in the United States, the longest pipeline in any region in the world. The pharmaceutical industry employs nearly a million people and supports more than three times that number in related and supplementary industries. All these place a high demand on biotech and pharmaceutical courses.

What should those aspiring for courses look for?

Biotech and Pharmaceutical Courses4

Certification is the primary criterion to look out in those seeking a biotech and pharmaceutical courses. Whether it is classroom or online courses that are opted for; certification by a certifying authority should be the determining admission to biotech and pharmaceutical courses.

CFPIE or the Center for Professional Innovation and Education Inc., BioPharma Institute and Center for Professional Advancement (CFPA) are some of the better known providers of certified biotech and pharmaceutical courses. This is a partial list of the areas on which courses are offered by these institutes/centers:

The following tripod of software-related issues forms the IEC 62304:2006’s foundation:

biotechandPharmaceuticalCoursesThese three attributes form the backbone of the test of a medical device company’s successful compliance with the regulatory requirements. For a medical device company to be successful in applying ISO 14971:2012 and IEC 62304:2006; it has to implement a cross-standard and resourceful way of integrating activities covering these requirements documents.

 

click to continue reading