Ensuring that analytical data in laboratories are accurate, reliable and consistent

Ensuring that analytical data are reliable, consistent and accurate is the fundamental reason for which analytical methods and procedures need to be validated. The employment of proper scientific methods and procedures by laboratories and validating them ensures the reliability, consistency and accuracy of the analytical data.

The purpose of doing so is to corroborate the suitability of intended use of a particular test and to confirm that the product produced in the laboratory meets the requirements of quality, purity, identity and strength in the required and set measure.

The imperative for validation of analytical data

The reason for which analytical data has to be validated for the criteria described above can be summarized in the following:

o  Because of the direct relationship it has to the quality of the data it validates;

o  To make sure that the analytical data is trustworthy;, and

o  Finally, validation, verification and transfer of analytical methods are a regulatory requirement, as set out by the different regulatory bodies such as the FDA and the EMA, and standards such as the USP and ICH.

Method validation and compendial methods

Of late, method validation has been receiving very high attention from both regulatory agencies and industry task forces alike. Both the FDA and the EMA have recently released guidelines on method validation and transfer. In addition, USP has suggested new chapters for approaches to the following:

o  Integrated validation

o  Verification and transfer of analytical procedures

o  Equivalency testing and for statistical evaluation.

What about compendial methods?

The verification of compendial methods is needed to demonstrate two aspects:

o  The suitability of laboratories to successfully run the method, and

o  To demonstrate through testing that transfer of methods, when carried on between laboratories, is successful. When a laboratory intends to use an alternative method in place of a compendial method, verification of compendial measures should establish the equivalency of the alternative method.

Comprehensive learning on validation, verification and transfer of analytical methods

A two-day seminar from GlobalCompliancePanel, a leading provider of professional trainings for all the areas of regulatory compliance will address all the issues relating to validation, verification and transfer of analytical methods. At this seminar, Ludwig Huber, the director and editor of Labcompliance, the global online resource for validation and compliance and highly respected author of several books on compliance, will be Director.

To gain the full knowledge of all areas relating to validation, verification and transfer of analytical methods; register by logging on to http://www.globalcompliancepanel.com/control/globalseminars/~product_id=900858?linkedin-SEO .

This course has been pre-approved by RAPS as eligible for up to 12 credits towards a participant’s RAC recertification upon full completion.

Contents of the two-day seminar

Over the course of these two days, Huber will equip participants with the background needed for getting a proper understanding of the requirements that need to go into validation, verification and transfer of analytical methods. An even more significant learning he will offer is the one on strategies needed for this.

He will provide tools to implement most critical requirements. Also provided are templates and examples for developing inspection-ready documentation. Interactivity will be a major component of this seminar. Huber will sprinkle workshop exercises into and between the presentations. Around half of the total time will be dedicated to practical sessions with real life examples.

An additional bonus for participants is the assortment of tools the Director of this seminar will offer, such as SOPs, validation examples and checklists, all of which will be made readily available on a dedicated website, and which can be used to easily implement the learning gained in the course.

Validation of Pharmaceutical Water Systems


Thorough and proper validation of pharmaceutical water systems is highly essential for ensuring that the pharmaceutical unit uses the right quality of water. This is very important, because water is not only the source of life for humans; it enjoys the same importance in pharmaceuticals.

A very important reason for which validation of pharmaceutical water systems is necessary is that water is not only the most widely used raw material or substance in pharmaceuticals; it is also put to a number of uses in the pharmaceutical industry, such as Quality Control, process, production and formulation. Further, water comes with its own set of unique chemical properties that are obtained because of the hydrogen bonds present in it and its polarity. This makes water versatile, since it allows the dissolution, absorption, adsorption or suspension of various different compounds.

Process for pharmaceutical water systems validationvalidation-of-pharmaceutical-water-systems

Validation of pharmaceutical water systems is carried out in three phases:

Phase I, which is the investigational phase

Phase II, the short term control phase, and

Phase III, which is the long-term control phase

Pharmaceutical water systems are validated through these three steps or stages to demonstrate and ensure that the facility using pharmaceutical water systems has water under its control and is on the right track for production of the right quality and quantity of water in the short, medium and long terms.

Validation through commissioning and qualificationPharmaceutical water systems validation is carried out through two important steps, namely commissioning and qualification. Commissioning is about putting the validation of pharmaceutical water systems through the required phases using the prerequisite methods of documentation. This documentation is a core part of pharmaceutical water systems validation because it allows for different personnel in the organization to not only keep track of the processes involved, but also make changes when necessary.

Qualification as part of pharmaceutical water systems validationQualification is the next important stage of pharmaceutical water systems validation. Here, before a pharmaceutical water systems validation process is started, the pharmaceutical facility should implement the following important steps:

  • Design qualification (DQ)
  • Installation qualification (IQ) and
  • Operational qualification (OQ)

Phase I:In Phase I, the pharmaceuticals facility samples and tests water sampling for anywhere between two and four weeks for monitoring the water system. If the water system is free of failure during this phase, it is considered a successful phase of pharmaceutical water systems validation.

Phase II:In this phase of pharmaceutical water systems validation too, the water system sample is tested intensively for two to four weeks, during which the water sample should show that it is producing the right quantity of water under conditions of stated SOP.

Phase III:Phase III of pharmaceutical water systems validation is the longest and most arduous period, running to one year after completion of Phase I and Phase II. When the water sample passes through this phase, it is said to have completed the process of pharmaceutical water systems validation and is considered fit for pharmaceutical use.

Learn more on this topic by visiting : http://www.globalcompliancepanel.com/control/globalseminars/~product_id=900882SEMINAR?wordpress-SEO

Applied statistics for scientists and engineers

Applied statistics for scientists and engineers is necessary for a number of reasons. 21 CFR and guidance documents for the pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical, and medical device industries specify the application of statistical methods for these functions:

o  Setting validation criteria and specifications

o  Performing Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA)

o  Conducting stability analysis

o  Using Design of Experiment (DOE) for process development and validation

o  Developing process control charts, and

o  Determining process capability indices.

Since scientists and engineers are at the heart of these functions, they need to have a thorough knowledge of how to use applied statistics. Each of these particular applications requires different and specified statistical methods. The common tools used for setting acceptance criteria and specifications are data and tolerance intervals, while for setting expiries and conducting stability analysis studies; simple linear regression and analysis-of-covariance (ANCOVA) are used.

For analyzing designed experiment for process development and validation studies, two-sample hypothesis tests, analysis-of-variance (ANOVA), regression, and ANCOVA are methods used, while for developing process control charts and developing process capability indices; descriptive statistics (distribution, summary statistics), run charts, and probability (distributions) are used.

Explaining the importance of applied statistics for scientists and engineers

A seminar that is being organized by GlobalCompliancePanel, a leading provider of professional trainings for the areas of regulatory compliance, will explain the importance of applied statistics for scientists and engineers.

In the course of making the importance of applied statistics for scientists and engineers known; the Director at this seminar, Heath Rushing, who is the cofounder of Adsurgo and author of the book Design and Analysis of Experiments by Douglas Montgomery: A Supplement for using JMP, and has been an invited speaker on applicability of statistics for national and international conferences, will provide instruction on applied statistics for scientists and engineers and statistical methods for data analysis of applications related to the pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical, and medical device industries.

To enroll for this highly valuable and practical course on applied statistics for scientists and engineers, just register by visiting http://www.globalcompliancepanel.com/control/globalseminars/~product_id=900790?wordpress_SEO .

The course “Applied Statistics for Scientists and Engineers” has been pre-approved by RAPS as eligible for up to 12 credits towards a participant’s RAC recertification upon full completion.

The tools that help an understanding of applied statistics for scientists and engineers

This course on applied statistics for scientists and engineers will offer thorough instruction on how scientists and engineers need to apply the appropriate statistical approaches: descriptive statistics, data intervals, hypothesis testing, ANOVA, regression, ANCOVA, and model building. The Director will present the ways of establishing competence in each of these areas and industry-specific applications.

The application of statistical methods across the product quality lifecycle is specified in the 21 CFR and guidance documents for the pharmaceutical, biopharmaceutical, and medical device industries. There are many statistical methods that may be applied to satisfy this portion of the QSR. Yet, some commonly accepted methods can and should be used by all companies to:

o  Develop acceptance criteria

o  Ensure accurate and precise measurement systems

o  Fully characterize manufacturing processes

o  Monitor and control process results and

o  To select an appropriate number of samples.

At this seminar on applied statistics for scientists and engineers, Rushing will provide instruction on all these. He will cover the following areas over the two days of this seminar:

o  Describe and analyze the distribution of data

o  Develop summary statistics

o  Generate and analyze statistical intervals and hypothesis tests to make data-driven decisions

o  Describe the relationship between and among two or more factors or responses

o  Understand issues related to sampling and calculate appropriate sample sizes

o  Use statistical intervals to setting specifications/develop acceptance criteria

o  Use Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA) to estimate variance associated with: repeatability, intermediate precision, and reproducibility

o  Ensure your process is in (statistical) control and capable

Supplier Management Conference for Medical Device Manufacturing in HONG KONG



Supplier selection and management is one of the critical issues for medical device manufacturers. Suppliers provide materials and services to the device manufacturer, which means that they can be critical to performance and delivery of your device. Neither the FDA nor your notified body regulates your suppliers (with a few exceptions). They expect you to have an effective process to ensure your suppliers perform in the regulatory environment.

How well do you understand the requirements for supplier management?

Could you pass a regulatory audit or inspection without any issues?

This course delivers the tools, templates, and methods to help participants implement an effective and efficient supplier management program.

This two-day hands-on course provides a clear understanding of the underlying principles of supplier management. The course uses exercises to solidify understanding. In addition, the course uses FDA Warning Letters to illustrate the points and help you learn from others. As part of the practical implementation, the course includes receiving acceptance activities, outsourced processes, process validation at the suppliers’ location, supplier auditing techniques, and supplier issues in management review.

The course uses the Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF) framework, but expands it to cover other issues and techniques important in effective implementation.

Why should you attend:

Since FDA regulations do not allow them to audit your suppliers unless they make finished medical devices, they require that you have sufficient control over them. But from time to time the FDA makes a reinterpretation of what this means. This happened within the last f 5 years, so if you supplier management program is older than that, you need to make major changes in you supplier management program. This is why the Good Manufacturing Practice (aka Quality System Regulations) is called cGMP. The C stands for current, meaning what the FDA considers the current state of the art in the areas they regulate. Also European Notified Bodies also periodically update their expectations, and for suppliers this happened with the publication of a guidance document by the Notified Body Operations Group (NBOG).

This seminar will go into the details of the NBOG supplier guidance document and a GHTF (Global Harmonization Task Force) guidance that describes the current FDA expectation on supplier management.

One of the major things introduced in these guidance document, is the concept of Risk, and the use of identified risks as part of the evaluation and monitoring of suppliers.

This seminar will review requirements and expectation of the FDA and European Notified Bodies for supplier management, and then how to incorporate these into your own supplier management process.

Areas Covered in the Session:

  • Understand FDA QSR and ISO 13485 requirements for supplier management
  • Creating a Risk-based Multi-tier supplier classification system
  • Understand when suppliers have to register and list with the FDA
  • Defining and using supplier Metrics
  • Explain the link between design control and purchasing data
  • Develop an risk-based supplier management process
    • Incorporating supplier regulatory and safety risk
    • Incorporating supplier business risk
  • Create supplier measurement and monitoring systems
  • Understand the how to develop and implement supplier controls
  • Create a risk based Value-added system for supplier audits
  • How to prepare yourself and your contract manufacturer for unannounced audits from your Notified body
  • Creating acceptance criteria and understand how that fits into your supplier control process

Who will benefit:

  • Quality Managers
  • Quality Engineers
  • Audit Managers
  • Supplier Engineers
  • Internal quality auditors
  • Supplier auditors
  • Quality associates
  • Quality Specialists
  • Regulatory Compliance Managers


Day 1 Schedule

Lecture 1:


Lecture 2:

Fundamentals Regulatory Requirements

  • FDA Requirements
  • ISO 13485 requirements
  • Understanding the role of the Global Harmonization Task Force Guideline
  • Understanding NBOC Guideline and why it should be used

Lecture 3:

Planning the Supplier Management Program

  • Supplier Classification
  • Supplier QA agreements what are they and why are then

Day 2 Schedule

Lecture 1:

Planning Supplier Selection

Lecture 2:

Potential Suppliers

Lecture 3:

Supplier Selection

Lecture 4:

Implementing Supplier Controls

Lecture 5:

Monitoring, Measuring, and Evaluation

  • Periodic Monitoring
  • Re-evaluations

Lecture 6:

Supplier Audits – where do they add value

  • Planning your supplier audit schedule
  • How Notified Body unannounced audits affect your contract manufacturer
  • What you should do to prepare yourself and your contract manufacturer for unannounced Notified body audits

Lecture 7:

Feedback and Communication

  • Supplier meetings: Partnering with Key suppliers
  • Supplier Corrective Actions

Lecture 8:

Evaluating your current program to see how it measures up to regulatory Expectations


Betty Lane,

Founder and President, Be Quality Associates, LLC

Betty Lane has over 30 years’ experience in Medical Device quality assurance and regulatory affairs. She is the founder and President of Be Quality Associates, LLC, a consulting company helping small and medium sized medical device and diagnostic companies implement and improve their quality systems. Her work enables companies to manage their business in compliance with FDA and ISO 13485 requirements, as well for quality system requirements for other geographic area such as Europe and Canada. Her background in digital systems engineering enables her to facilitate quality system processes for design controls and software validation. Her areas of expertise include training, auditing, supplier management, document and records management, design controls, and software validation.

Betty’s training experience includes over 25 years of training on all aspects of ISO 13485, the ISO standard for Medical Device – Quality Management Systems – System Requirements for regulatory purposes, and FDA Quality System Regulation – Medical Devices; Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP), in companies where she worked as manager or director, and for AAMI, ASQ biomedical division, and ASQ sections. She has taught courses in medical device and biotechnology quality and regulatory affairs as an Adjunct at Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Betty is active in her local section of the American Society for Quality and is also a member of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), The Society of Women Engineers and the IEEE. Betty has degrees in engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), and an MBA from Northeastern University.

Location: Hong Kong Date: April 6th & 7th, 2017 and Time: 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM



Address: 18 Salisbury Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong




Price: $1,695.00 (Seminar Fee for One Delegate)


Until February 28, Early Bird Price: $1,695.00 from March 01 to April 04, Regular Price: $1,895.00


Register for 5 attendees   Price: $5,085.00 $8,475.00 You Save: $3,390.00 (40%)*


Quick Contact:

NetZealous DBA as GlobalCompliancePanel


Phone: 1-800-447-9407

Fax: 302-288-6884

Email: support@globalcompliancepanel.com

Website: http://www.globalcompliancepanel.com

Registration Link – http://www.globalcompliancepanel.com/control/globalseminars/~product_id=900878SEMINAR?channel=mailer&camp=seminar&AdGroup=wordpress_April_2017_SEO

Follow on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/globalcompliancepanel












Software Validation Process for 21 CFR Part 11

Software Validation Process for 21 CFR Part 11 is all about authenticity and integrity of electronic signatures and records. Care should be taken to avoid confusion and get validation right.

The FDA’s Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) is a collection of laws that regulate the various government agencies. Different titles of the CFR govern respective regulated areas.

What is 21 CFR Part 11?

Codes contained in21 CFR Part 11 relate to electronic records and approval signatures, which are digital versions of paper documents and handwritten signatures. 21 CFR Part 11enables

  • A paper record to be replaced by an electronic record
  • Any handwritten signature to be replaced with an electronic signature
  • The software of these systems to be validated, so that the authenticity of electronic signatures can be proven
  • An organization to implement good business practices.

Why is software validation process for 21 CFR Part 11 necessary?

With the widespread proliferation, reach and prevalence of the use of computers; it is a given that people would like to use electronic records instead of paper records. CFRs became necessary as records graduated to the electronic format, because of which validation of these signatures for their authenticity also became necessary.

An intrinsic part of SOPs

The software validation process for 21 CFR Part 11 is enshrined in the regulated company’s Standard Operating Procedures (SOP’s), which describe the way in which processes are to be performed. In the course of implementation of the software validation process for 21 CFR Part 11; any paper record, inclusive of signatures, is to be replaced with an electronic one, given that the computer system is validated and has appropriate features.

Primary areas software validation process for 21 CFR Part 11 compliance

21 CFR Part 11 compliance consists of three primary areas:

Read More