GlobalCompliancePanel announces Seasonal offers for Professionals with Flat 50% OFF on all Seminars

9ad816e7329ad74d53132accd3156c40

Do celebrations need a cause and a reason? Yes, and GlobalCompliancePanel, a leading provider of professional trainings for the regulatory compliance areas, is having a solid cause and reason for doing so. It is celebrating the many years of its relationship with its customers spread all over the world by offering its trainings at a massive 50% discount!

Yes, that is right. GlobalCompliancePanel’s seminars will be available for a huge 50% discount till April 30. Regulatory professionals who want to augment their knowledge of regulatory compliance can now do so by paying just half the price of these trainings from GlobalCompliancePanel. All that is needed to do walk away with a rare offer such as this is to visit https://www.globalcompliancepanel.com/seminar?wordpress_SEO and use MGCP50 Promo Code.

This offer is valid till April 30, 2017. Regulatory professionals who want to take any of GlobalCompliancePanel’s trainings can book their trainings for an area of their interest by this date. From April 1 onwards, this offer will cease, meaning that the original price will apply from then.

So, why is GlobalCompliancePanel offering this discount? It is for a simple, but profound reason: It wants to thank its huge customer base for the support they have been extending to this company over the many years for which it has been in business. During the course of the 10 years for which GlobalCompliancePanel has been in business, it has trained thousands of regulatory compliance professionals from around the world.

These professionals, belonging to such varied geographies as the US and Japan and India and Canada, have been able to meet their regulatory compliance challenges on account of these trainings. These trainings are relevant, focused and valuable, and are from some of the best known regulatory compliance Experts found anywhere on this planet.

It is these trainings that have been hoping these professionals in the regulatory compliance arena gain more insights into regulations from the FDA, the EMA and other such bodies around the world. These trainings have been consistently helping them to meet these challenges, as they give them a better and sharper understanding of the implementing these requirements.

These regulatory requirements can pose hurdles to the most experienced and brightest of regulatory compliance professionals in the medical devices, pharmaceutical, life sciences and food and biologicals areas, but not to those who undertake professional trainings from GlobalCompliancePanel. GlobalCompliancePanel’s panel of experts is here to help them overcome these challenges and hurdles.

This trend has been being witnessed from the time GlobalCompliancePanel entered the line of professional trainings. Any wonder then, that no fewer than 50,000 professionals have benefited from these trainings? What could be a better way of thanking such a huge base of customers than with this offer? GlobalCompliancePanel believes that a celebration should also be useful, and this is that this offer is!

Hurry up and enroll today. Happy learning!

 

 

Ways of conducting a hassle-free internal and supplier audit for medical devices

Carrying out efficient and effective internal and supplier audits that meet all the requirements of external auditors is a must for medical device manufacturers. These audits should not only serve this purpose; they should also add value to the medical device organization.

Part of both ISO 13485 and QMS

Internal audits are required as part of ISO 13485 and the FDA’s Quality System Regulation (QMS). However, these procedures are quite complicated for many professionals in the medical device industry.  They are often confusing and cumbersome, mainly because of the jargon and regulatory language they contain. Many organizations find it difficult to get the import of these words while wading through them all the way to a successful internal audit.

quality-management

A tad complicated

Another couple of complicating factors come into play: Since the FDA does not look at the content of internal audits; many medical device organizations do not get feedback on the true effectiveness of their internal audit system from the FDA during the time of FDA inspections.

images-1

Secondly, while on the other hand ISO 13485 auditors do look at internal audits; they are most concerned with the process. For them, a proper definition of a process that meets the requirements of the standard and the assurance that the company is following these are more important than anything else.

Auditor training is necessary

Both these regulations require that the medical device manufacturer define Auditor training. But there is a catch, because auditor training sometimes just requires reading the company’s procedure, while most external auditors will look for more than this.

medical-device3

How does a medical device company extricate itself out of this quagmire? The solution to all these vexing questions will be offered at a two-day seminar from GlobalCompliancePanel, a globally known provider of regulatory compliance trainings.

At this seminar to enroll for which you need to just log on to http://www.globalcompliancepanel.com/control/globalseminars/~product_id=900601SEMINAR; the Director, Betty Lane, who is Founder and President, Be Quality Associates, LLC, will explain all the issues relating to these aspects of external and internal supplier audits, in a way that is comprehensible and easy to implement.

In the process of explaining what makes for efficient and effective internal and supplier quality systems auditing for medical devices; she will also offer an explanation of best practices for creating and managing a value-added auditing process that will meet both company business needs and regulatory requirements.

At this seminar, which has been pre-approved by RAPS as eligible for up to 12 credits towards a participant’s RAC recertification upon full completion; Betty will get participants to review all the quality management system requirements of FDA and ISO 13485 and then allow them to learn how to set up and manage an audit system that complies with these requirements, yet is risk-based so that their organization makes the most efficient use of auditing resources for both internal and supplier audits.

compliance2

She will also include interactive exercises at this two-day session, which will help to strengthen the fundamentals of conducting and documenting quality system audits. The auditing principles taught in this seminar will be based on ISO 19011:2011 Guidelines for auditing management systems.

Comprehensive risk management is a must for medical device software

Diligent, complete and correct implementation of risk management of software used in medical devices that takes into consideration the gaps and corrects them from the start of product development is absolutely imperative. This is because of two critical reasons:

  1. Gaps, incorrect or incomplete implementation can retard or delay or make the certification/approval of medical products impossible;
  2. Since most activities are closely linked to the development lifecycle; almost none of it can be retrospectively performed. This renders all activities performed till the identification of gaps useless and redundant; making it necessary to start from the beginning, no matter at what stage an anomaly is discovered.

Embedding software risk management into the bigger scope of overall risk management is the way forward if these fiascos have to be avoided.

Risk Management Shows Identifying, Evaluating And Treating Risks

Learn the ways of doing it right from start till finish

The proper ways of how to take all the necessary steps for designing, implementing and testing critical medical device software in a regulatory compliant environment will be the learning a two-day, live seminar being organized by GlobalCompliancePanel, a very respected provider of professional trainings for the regulatory compliance areas will impart.

medical-dev

Markus Weber, Principal Consultant with System Safety, Inc., who specializes in safety engineering and risk management for critical medical devices, will be the course Director. To participate in this very important seminar, please log on to http://www.globalcompliancepanel.com/control/globalseminars/~product_id=900683SEMINAR.

In line with globally applicable standard requirements

International consensus, reflected in globally applicable standard requirements such as ISO14971 and IEC62304, has led to risk management being a mandatory component of almost any activity in the medical device industry. This course will explain these requirements.

Given that software risk management has to be embedded into the bigger scope of overall risk management; Markus will introduce all the steps necessary to design, implement and test critical medical device software in a regulatory compliant environment while adhering to the principles of risk management. In addition, he will also address the system level risk management and the resulting interfaces to software.

Understanding safety assurance cases

The ‘Safety Case’ or ‘Assurance Case’ document is a well-established method to collect all safety related information together in one place to comprehensively summarize all risk related activities and to demonstrate the safe properties of a device. Currently only required for FDA infusion pump submissions; this documentation will most likely become mandatory for all devices. This course will introduce the basic concepts and content of safety assurance cases and will illustrate their usefulness for internal and external review of safety related information.

images-1

This seminar will use real-life examples and proven tips and tricks to make the application of risk management a practical and beneficial undertaking. It will address the system level issues of risk management as well as the increasingly important software related issues of critical systems. The concept of an assurance case will be introduced to make the combined effort towards designing, implementing and verifying a safe device transparent. The outcome of this learning is that it will help to comply with regulatory requirements with minimized overhead and resource burden.

Tools and Methodologies to Predict and Improve Product Reliability

Improving product reliability may be the primary objective of reliability analysis; yet, there are many possible reasons for collecting and analyzing reliability data. There are many examples of collecting and analyzing reliability data. This could be done to assess product reliability in the field. It could be to predict product warranty costs. It could be for estimating replacement part/spares requirements.

Other examples of collecting and analyzing reliability data include:

  • To assess the effect of a proposed design change
  • To demonstrate product reliability to customers or government agencies
  • To compare components from multiple suppliers
  • To compare components from different production periods, operating environments, or materials
  • For improving reliability through the use of laboratory experiments.

Methodologies for doing these

There is a certain overall methodology for setting reliability targets, estimating product reliability from test data and/or field data, and determining whether or not reliability targets are achieved. The intricacies of this methodology will be the content of a two-day, in person live seminar that is being organized by GlobalCompliancePanel, a leading provider of professional trainings for the regulatory compliance areas.

regulatory-compliance

Steve Wachs, who is currently a Principal Statistician at Integral Concepts, Inc., brings over 25 years of wide-ranging industry experience in both technical and management positions. To derive the benefit of hearing this experienced professional, just log on to http://www.globalcompliancepanel.com/control/globalseminars/~product_id=900409SEMINAR to register. This course has been pre-approved by RAPS as eligible for up to 12 credits towards a participant’s RAC recertification upon full completion.

Calculating sample sizes

Steve will discuss the methods for estimating the reliability of subsystems and systems. He will also show how to calculate sample sizes for reliability testing and utilize reliability models to develop forecasts of future failures (e.g. warranty forecasts).

quality4

This course will immensely benefit anyone with an interest in product quality and reliability, such as Product Engineers, Reliability Engineers, Design Engineers, Quality Engineers, Quality Assurance Managers, Project/Program Managers, or Manufacturing Personnel.

Steve will help participants with the following:

  • Understand reliability concepts and unique aspects of reliability data
  • Understand underlying probability and statistical concepts for reliability analysis
  • Develop competency in the modeling and analysis of time-to-failure data
  • Understand reliability metrics and how to estimate and report them
  • Estimate reliability of subsystems and systems
  • Determine if reliability specifications are met (at specified confidence level) or whether design improvements are required
  • Develop competency in the planning of reliability tests (excluding ALT)
  • Analyze existing warranty data to predict future returns
  • Develop awareness of more advanced topics in Reliability

Preparing for an ISO 13485 audit

Being the current standard for medical devices; the ISO 13485 prescribes a set of standards that are to be implemented by manufacturers of medical devices. The aim of ISO 13485 is to ensure that medical devices meet the prescribed quality standards. This standard was conceived with the intention of making medical device manufacturers understand ways by which to establish a medical device risk management process.

Implementation needs proper training

Implementation of the ISO 13485 needs expert knowledge. Medical device organizations that need to implement it need to have trained staff, which needs to be aware of what to do when they are approached by an auditor. They should also know what documentation must be completed, kept up-to-date, and be made available, so that the organization can avoid major and minor findings. In addition, they should also be thoroughly aware of the issues that auditors constantly look for. They need to also be knowledgeable about the new updated standard.

risk

Get trained on how to prepare

To make medical device professionals that face an ISO audit familiar with the dynamics of an ISO audit and to acquaint them with what it takes to be prepared for one when it happens, GlobalCompliancePanel, a globally known provider of professional trainings for the areas of regulatory compliance, will be organizing a two-day, in person seminar.

personalmedicalequipment

To enroll for this seminar and to get a thorough understanding of the ways by which to implement ISO 13485, just log on to http://www.globalcompliancepanel.com/control/globalseminars/~product_id=900708.

The Director at this seminar, Jason Teliszczak, who is CEO/Founder, JT Environmental Consulting, will give a complete understanding of how to prepare for an ISO audit in a manner that helps organizations defend their actions with the auditors and to avoid a number of errors and goof-ups that could result in harsh actions. In taking a detailed look at each section of the standard; Jason will let participants understand the core elements of an ISO audit.

He will offer real world examples of what to expect, and what to prepare and repeal within the audit guidelines, the ways of ensuring a compliant documentation system, infrastructure maintenance, PPE, ensuring quality by the judicious use of materials, ways of choosing suppliers and vendors, ways of going about an internal audit, and the role of management in certification.

Verification vs validation is a key understanding for regulatory professionals

For regulatory professionals, aspects of verification and validation, such as how to get verification and validation right, and an understanding of the ways in which verification and validation diverge from each other and converge, make up very important learning. The key point is that verification and validation should be risk based and be built keeping in mind the extant regulatory expectations.

risk-management

Building a verification and validation process that sufficiently uses targeted and documented risk based verification and validation test case elements or scripts is the foundation to this. All these have to be reviewed against ISO 14971 and ICH Q 9 hazard analysis and product risk management.

Getting their V & V right involves gaining and exercising proper knowledge of these areas on the part of professionals working in regulatory environments. This learning is what a two-day seminar by GlobalCompliancePanel, a very well-known provider of professional trainings for all the areas of regulatory compliance, will impart.

V & V against the regulatory process

The Director of this seminar, John E Lincoln, a senior Consultant for Medical device and Regulatory Affairs, will explain the rationale behind verification and validation and clear all the ambiguities relating to this activity.

He will help participants to understand the following:

  • Evaluating different field-tested, U.S. FDA-reviewed V&V protocols
  • Ways by which to employ equipment/process Requirements Specs/DQs, IQs, OQs, and PQs, or their equivalents per ASTM E2500. John E Lincoln will help participants how to do all these against a background of limited company resources
  • Reviewing a matrix that simplifies “as-product”, “in-product”, process and equipment and related matters
  • Software VT&V to ensure that key FDA requirements are not overlooked

To enroll for this course, just log on to http://www.globalcompliancepanel.com/control/globalseminars/~product_id=900645SEMINAR?verification-vs-validation-qms-Las-Vegas.

The Director will also offer hands-on understanding of Quality Management Systems and 21 CFR Part 11. This seminar will help participants:

quality-management1

  • Understand Verification and Validation, differences and how they work together;
  • Know how to document a “risk-based” rationale, and use it in a resource-constrained environment;
  • Determine key “milestones” and “tasks” in a project;
  • Locate and document key subject “inputs”;
  • Compile “generic” Master and Individual Validation Plans;
  • Learn the key element of a Product V&V File/Protocol;
  • Understand how to develop Process and/or Production/Test Equipment V&V Files/Protocols;
  • Get a grasp of basic Test Case construction;
  • Understand sample sizes and their justification;
  • Learn the key elements of Software V&V expected by the FDA and how to document;
  • Deal with hardware and software vendors, sales and marketing
  • Consider a field-tested software V&V documentation “model”;
  • See how to compile QMS Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures V&Vs to satisfy 21 CFR Part 11.

Implementing the 510 (K) correctly in compliance with the latest proposed FDA changes

A 510(K) is a premarket submission made to FDA to demonstrate that a device to be marketed is at least as safe and effective, meaning that which is substantially equivalent, to a legally marketed device that is not subject to premarket approval (PMA).

There are three types of Premarket Notification 510(K)’s that may be submitted to FDA: Traditional, Special, and Abbreviated. Product modifications that could significantly affect safety and effectiveness are subject to 510(K) submission requirements under 21 CFR 807 as well as design control requirements under the Quality System (QS) regulation. Under the QS regulation, all Class II and III devices and certain Class I devices are required to be designed in conformance with 21 CFR 820.30 Design Controls. The FDA provides guidance on these.

images-1

Needed: A thorough understanding of these aspects and the FDA’s latest proposed changes

In accordance with the concern evinced by many industry groups and associations, the FDA introduced as many as 60 proposals in August 2010, into the manner in which the 510 (K) process could be expedited. This was done with the intention of accelerating the speed at which newly approved medical devices could be made available to patients across the country. However, with the number of proposals being too many and their scope being too wide; the medical industry suggested that the FDA select for implementation only those proposals that enjoyed the broad consensus of the stakeholders, such as increased reviewer training, development of specific and relevant guidance documents, and enhancements or improvements to the de novo review pathway, among other suggestions.

An upcoming seminar by GlobalCompliancePanel, a leading provider of professional trainings for the regulatory compliance industries, will clarify on these areas taken up for immediate change by the FDA and place them in the right context. It will address key resources when making critical decisions. This seminar will offer important insights into the core areas of premarket notifications, as well as the Design Control requirements under QS regulations and Design Controls.

qualit

To enroll for this seminar, just log on to

http://www.globalcompliancepanel.com/control/globalseminars/~product_id=900525SEMINAR?bullet-proof-510(k)-Seattle-WA

The Director at this seminar is David R. Dills, a senior Regulatory Affairs & Compliance Consultant. David provides regulatory, compliance and quality consultative services for medical device and pharmaceutical/combination manufacturers, and also has an accomplished record with more than 24 years of experience with Class I/II/III medical devices, In Vitro diagnostics, and pharmaceuticals in the areas of Regulatory Affairs, Compliance and Quality Systems.

An understanding of the core elements of the PMA

At this seminar, David will help participants understand how medical device manufacturers can locate a “predicate” device and go through the content and format of the 510(K), and offer an understanding of the De Novo process and the expectations for possibly marketing a low risk device, and the potential impact of FDA’s proposed changes to the 510(K) process and why manufacturers need to pay attention to these.

He will also offer understanding of all the crucial aspects of the PMA, such as the differences between the Traditional, Special and Abbreviated submissions, an understanding of the Substantial Equivalence and how it is applied, who is required to submit the application to FDA, where to submit the 510(K) and what to expect with the review and approval process, when a device company requires this process and when it does not, the applicable exemptions to the submission process and special considerations, and so on.